top of page

MERIDIAN
Ceramic
Implants

Meridian ceramic implant

Ceramic implants for dental professionals.

The STEINSOHN Ceramics team draws on more than 30 years of experience in dentistry.

Designed to make
a difference.

 

Meridian ceramic implant

BIO-X GLASS-CERAMIC

Meridian ceramic implant

Strength. Stability. Safety.
 

Made by MILLING

DEVELOPED BY DENTISTS 

The Bioactive Ceramic Implant.

Explore the MERIDIAN implant system.

Discover ceramic dental implants, prosthetic components and surgical instruments for professional use. Select each component according to the planned restoration, the clinical assessment and the current product Instructions for Use (IFU). For material specifications, indications and compatibility, contact the STEINSOHN team.

Research context

The 2019 Scientific Reports study below evaluated coatings on zirconia-toughened alumina implants in a sheep model. It does not establish clinical performance for MERIDIAN or BIO-X implants.

Material research and clinical evidence for a finished implant system should be assessed separately.

Reference: Pobloth et al., Scientific Reports 9, 16692 (2019). Read the study.

steinsohn Meridian dental implant

MERIDIAN® CERAMIC DENTAL IMPLANTS

Implants, prosthetic components and surgical instruments.

Explore the MERIDIAN range and find components for your planned restoration. Contact our team for product information, compatibility questions and professional education.

Clinical selection and use must follow the current product Instructions for Use.

CERAMIC DRILLS

 

An implant kit with ATZ ceramic drills and a surgical tray for organising the instruments. Select the drill sequence for the planned implant and clinical situation. Follow the current Instructions for Use for operating parameters, irrigation, cleaning, sterilisation and instrument replacement.

Smarter.
Brighter.
Mightier.
MERIDIAN 6 S

   SWITCH CONNECTION 

The MERIDIAN 6S two-piece implant features a switch connection, BB chambers 2 and a force absorber.

Ceramic implant
Meridian ceramic implant
Meridian ceramic implant

"BYE BYE INJECTION MOLDING"
 
 Developed by DENTISTS

Meridian ceramic dental implant
Meridian ceramic implant

Why Choose Ceramic Dental Implants?

Ceramic dental implants are an option for clinicians considering a ceramic implant body as part of the planned restoration. The choice of system should take account of its material, design, available components, intended use and supporting evidence.

For MERIDIAN, review the documentation for the specific implant and component selected. Material properties alone do not establish clinical outcomes. Patient assessment and the current Instructions for Use remain essential to treatment planning.

What Makes MERIDIAN Ceramic Implants Different?

MERIDIAN brings ceramic implants, prosthetic components and surgical instruments together in one product range. Explore one-piece and two-piece implant concepts and review the components for your planned restoration.

Assess each product by its specific material, connection and intended use. For technical documentation, component compatibility or professional education, contact STEINSOHN at yes@steinsohnceramics.com.

From Biomaterial to Clinical Reality

Address

18. Stycznia 22

87-300 Brodnica

Poland

Tel +48 500 800 170

Email

Connect

  • Instagram

Magnetic Force Instead of Drilling. 
 

Meridian ceramic implant

Culture of BIOGLASS CERAMIC

Bibliography

Scientific Reports 2019, 9:16692

Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm

i. R. Kohal, J. Bernhart, M. Sperlich (EAO 2010, Clinical Evaluation of an Alumina Toughened Zirconia Oral Implant: 1-Year Follow-Up)

ii. M. Bachle (2010 Evaluation der Osseointegration und mechanischen Stabilität von ATZ-Miniimplantaten mit ZircaPore-Oberfläche im Rattenfemur), Pub. in prep.

iii. N. J. Attard, George A. Zarb, J Prosthet Dental 2005;94:242-58

iv. A. Wennerberg, Int. Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15, 331-344

v. B. Setzer, M. Bachle, M. Metzger, R. Kohal, Biomaterials 30 (2009) 979-990

vi. J. Schneider et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91(11) 3613-3618 (2008)             

vii. Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Mueller C, Clin. Oral Impl. Res.10.111/j.1600-0501.2010.01954-x

viii. Andreiotelli, Wenz, Kohal, Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 20 (Suppl. 4), 2009; 32-47

ix. Sterner et al., 2004, Biomed. Technik, Bd. 49, Heft 12 2004

x. R. Kohal, J. Bernhart, M. Sperlich (2011, Clinical Evaluation of an Alumina Toughened Zirconia Oral Implant: 2-Year Follow-Up), Pub. in prep.

Spies et al., 2016 – 1-Jahres-Ergebnisse einteiliger ATZ-Implantate (prospektive Kohorte). PubMed

Mohseni et al., 2023 – Systematisches Review/Meta-Analyse: geschätzte 10-Jahres-CSR ~95 % für Zirkonimplantate. PMC+1

Gul et al., 2024. sciencedirect.com

Padhye et al., 2023 – Vergleich Zirkon vs. Titan (Systematic Review): ähnliche Erfolgsraten; Ästhetik tendenziell besser bei Zirkon. PMC

Morena et al., 2024 – Meta-Analyse: nach 1 Jahr etwas geringere Überlebensrate/MBL bei Zirkon vs. Titan. PubMed

Arefnia et al., 2025 – Systematisches Review zu Patient-Reported Outcomes bei Zirkonimplantaten. SpringerOpen

Hashim, 2016 – Systematisches Review (frühe Daten): 1-Jahres-Überleben ~92 % (ein-/zweiteilig). d-nb.info

Sadowsky, 2023 (Mapping Review) – Überblick: Vorteile, aber LTD-Risiko (Low-Temperature Degradation) beachten. mdpi.com

Kohal et al., 2025 – Explantat-Studie: Nachweis signifikanter t→m-Transformation nach bis zu 15 Jahren (Y-TZP). sciencedirect.com

Saberian et al., 2024 – In-vitro-Vergleich der Osteoblastenantwort ATZ vs. Titan (zellbiologischer Kontrast). PMC+1

bottom of page